DEEPAK KUMAR RAI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY — B.A./4950/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 318(2),318(4),271,272,274,275,3(5),BNS,47(a),EXCISE,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010178132026

Filing Number

B.A./11502/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

B.A./4950/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CUSTOM & EXCISE ( 122 )

Sub-Category

Excise (malt Liquors) Act,1890 ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 318(2),318(4),271,272,274,275,3(5),BNS,47(a),EXCISE,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEEPAK KUMAR RAI

    Adv. PRASHANT KUMAR RAI,DEEPAK KUMAR SINGH,DEEPAK KUMAR SINGH, ,DEEPAK KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Deepak Kumar Rai, an accused driver in a spurious liquor seizure case (Daltonganj Town P.S. Case No. 57 of 2026), considering his custody period since 12.02.2026. The court directed his release on bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties of equal amount each, despite the State's opposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  4. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./4950/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Deepak Kumar Rai, an accused driver in a spurious liquor seizure case (Daltonganj Town P.S. Case No. 57 of 2026), considering his custody period since 12.02.2026. The court directed his release on bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties of equal amount each, despite the State's opposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case