SONU KUMAR RAY vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA — B.A./5076/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 20(b),(ii),(A),NDPS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 10th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010178052026
Filing Number
B.A./11496/2026
Filing Date
25-May-2026
Registration No
B.A./5076/2026
Registration Date
02-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
DRUGS & MEDICINES ( 125 )
Sub-Category
Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SONU KUMAR RAY
Adv. PRIYANSHU NILESH,MR RAHUL DEV,MR RAHUL DEV, ,ROUNAK FIRDOUS,MR RAHUL DEV
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Sonu Kumar Ray, accused of illegal possession of 630 gm of Ganja under NDPS Act Section 20(b)(ii)(A), considering his clean criminal record, intermediate quantity of contraband, and custody duration since May 6, 2026. Ray was directed to furnish a Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties and comply with conditions including trial cooperation, provision of mobile number and Aadhar details, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
25-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./5076/2026
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Sonu Kumar Ray, accused of illegal possession of 630 gm of Ganja under NDPS Act Section 20(b)(ii)(A), considering his clean criminal record, intermediate quantity of contraband, and custody duration since May 6, 2026. Ray was directed to furnish a Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties and comply with conditions including trial cooperation, provision of mobile number and Aadhar details, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts