AZHARUDDIN @ AZHAR ALI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - AZEEMUDDIN — B.A./5072/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 304(2),115(2),318(4),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 10th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010177982026
Filing Number
B.A./11489/2026
Filing Date
25-May-2026
Registration No
B.A./5072/2026
Registration Date
02-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AZHARUDDIN @ AZHAR ALI
Adv. RAHUL PANDEY, ,BHASKAR KUMAR,BHANU KUMAR No.1
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - AZEEMUDDIN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: B.A. 5072/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Azharuddin @ Azhar Ali, accused of snatching an ATM card (charges under BNS 2023 Sections 304(2), 115(2), 318(4)), after he had been in custody since February 25, 2026. The court directed his release on a Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, conditional upon his cooperation with trial, furnishing mobile number and Aadhar photocopy, maintaining contact availability, and not intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
25-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./5072/2026
Case Summary: B.A. 5072/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Azharuddin @ Azhar Ali, accused of snatching an ATM card (charges under BNS 2023 Sections 304(2), 115(2), 318(4)), after he had been in custody since February 25, 2026. The court directed his release on a Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, conditional upon his cooperation with trial, furnishing mobile number and Aadhar photocopy, maintaining contact availability, and not intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts