MOHD. JAREEF vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRIYA SHRESTHA — B.A./4973/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 7(I),(a),EC,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010177902026

Filing Number

B.A./11481/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

B.A./4973/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES ( 131 )

Sub-Category

Essential Commodities Act, 1955 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 7(I),(a),EC,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD. JAREEF

    Adv. RAHUL PANDEY,BHASKAR KUMAR,BHASKAR KUMAR, ,BHANU KUMAR No.1,BHASKAR KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRIYA SHRESTHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to petitioner Mohd. Jareef, an accused in Ormanjhi P.S. Case No.50 of 2026 involving recovery of nine commercial gas cylinders from his restaurant. The court found the specific allegations were directed against another person (Sandeep Sahu) and ordered the petitioner's release on a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  4. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./4973/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to petitioner Mohd. Jareef, an accused in Ormanjhi P.S. Case No.50 of 2026 involving recovery of nine commercial gas cylinders from his restaurant. The court found the specific allegations were directed against another person (Sandeep Sahu) and ordered the petitioner's release on a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case