ABHISHEK MUNDA @ ABHISHEK MUNDA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - TARUN KUMAR — B.A./5071/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 309(6),BNS,25(I-B),a,26,35,ARMS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 10th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010177762026
Filing Number
B.A./11467/2026
Filing Date
25-May-2026
Registration No
B.A./5071/2026
Registration Date
02-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )
Sub-Category
Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ABHISHEK MUNDA @ ABHISHEK MUNDA
Adv. VIKASH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - TARUN KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Abhishek Munda, accused of robbery of Rs. 5,00,000 under Section 309(6) BNS 2023 in Chaibasa Sadar PS Case No. 67/2025, despite state opposition. The court directed his release on Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, imposing conditions including cooperation with trial, furnishing mobile number and Aadhar card, maintaining contact availability, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
25-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./5071/2026
Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Abhishek Munda, accused of robbery of Rs. 5,00,000 under Section 309(6) BNS 2023 in Chaibasa Sadar PS Case No. 67/2025, despite state opposition. The court directed his release on Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, imposing conditions including cooperation with trial, furnishing mobile number and Aadhar card, maintaining contact availability, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts