AWDHESH RAM vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - NEHALA SHARMIN — B.A./4964/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 420,467,468,471,409,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010177712026

Filing Number

B.A./11462/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

B.A./4964/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 420,467,468,471,409,IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AWDHESH RAM

    Adv. GOPAL K. SINHA,CHANCHAL CHHAYA,CHANCHAL CHHAYA, ,APURV KRISHNA,CHANCHAL CHHAYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - NEHALA SHARMIN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Awdhesh Ram, an employee accused of embezzling firm funds in connection with Rehla P.S. Case No.15 of 2025. The court released him on a Rs.10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, primarily because a similarly situated co-accused (Mukesh Thakur) had already been granted anticipatory bail, establishing parity in treatment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  4. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./4964/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Awdhesh Ram, an employee accused of embezzling firm funds in connection with Rehla P.S. Case No.15 of 2025. The court released him on a Rs.10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, primarily because a similarly situated co-accused (Mukesh Thakur) had already been granted anticipatory bail, establishing parity in treatment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case