BIJAY NAYAK ALIAS VIJAY NAYAK vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABIR KUMAR CHATTERJEE alias PRABIR CHATTERJEE — B.A./5067/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 302,201,120B,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010177682026

Filing Number

B.A./11459/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

B.A./5067/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 302,201,120B,IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BIJAY NAYAK ALIAS VIJAY NAYAK

    Adv. RUPESH KUMAR,SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA,SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA, ,SATYAM KUMAR,SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABIR KUMAR CHATTERJEE alias PRABIR CHATTERJEE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: B.A. No. 5067/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Bijay Nayak's second bail plea in a murder case (IPC Sections 302, 201, 120B). Although the petitioner argued that charge-framing constituted new grounds for reconsideration, the court held that framing of charges does not justify reversing an earlier merit-based bail rejection and is instead an aggravating factor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./5067/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: B.A. No. 5067/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Bijay Nayak's second bail plea in a murder case (IPC Sections 302, 201, 120B). Although the petitioner argued that charge-framing constituted new grounds for reconsideration, the court held that framing of charges does not justify reversing an earlier merit-based bail rejection and is instead an aggravating factor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case