SHAMBHU KUMAR DAS vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABHU DAYAL AGRAWAL — B.A./4886/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 111(2),(b),111(3),111(4),318(4),338,336(3),340(2),61(2),BNS,66B,66C66D,84(C),IT,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010177412026
Filing Number
B.A./11436/2026
Filing Date
23-May-2026
Registration No
B.A./4886/2026
Registration Date
29-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Information Technology Act, 2000 ( 208 )
Sub-Category
Cyber Crime ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAMBHU KUMAR DAS
Adv. ANKIT KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABHU DAYAL AGRAWAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
Case Summary: B.A. 4886/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Shambhu Kumar Das, accused in a cyber crime case (Deoghar PS Case No. 54/2026), after considering that no victim complaint had been filed and he had been in custody since April 12, 2026. The court ordered his release on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with the condition that one surety must be a close relative and he must attend all trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
23-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./4886/2026
Case Summary: B.A. 4886/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Shambhu Kumar Das, accused in a cyber crime case (Deoghar PS Case No. 54/2026), after considering that no victim complaint had been filed and he had been in custody since April 12, 2026. The court ordered his release on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with the condition that one surety must be a close relative and he must attend all trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts