CHUNCHUN YADAV vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY — B.A./4888/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 319(3),318(4),338,336(3),340(2),BNS,66B,66C66D,84(C),IT,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010177282026

Filing Number

B.A./11424/2026

Filing Date

23-May-2026

Registration No

B.A./4888/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Information Technology Act, 2000 ( 208 )

Sub-Category

Cyber Crime ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 319(3),318(4),338,336(3),340(2),BNS,66B,66C66D,84(C),IT,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHUNCHUN YADAV

    Adv. RAHUL RANJAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Chunchun Yadav, accused in a cyber crime case, considering that no victim had filed a complaint, the petitioner had no criminal history, and had been in custody since April 28, 2026. The court ordered his release on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with one surety being a close relative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  4. 23-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./4888/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Chunchun Yadav, accused in a cyber crime case, considering that no victim had filed a complaint, the petitioner had no criminal history, and had been in custody since April 28, 2026. The court ordered his release on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with one surety being a close relative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case