SULEMAN TUTI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAKESH RANJAN — B.A./4900/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 376,506,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010176782026

Filing Number

B.A./11383/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

B.A./4900/2026

Registration Date

30-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 376,506,IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SULEMAN TUTI

    Adv. ABHAY KR CHATURVEDY,CHANDAN KUMAR,CHANDAN KUMAR, ,CHANDAN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAKESH RANJAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Suleman Tuti's bail plea in a rape case, marking the third rejection after previous denials in 2024 and 2025. Despite arguments that the case was instituted at the victim's husband's instance and the petitioner has been in custody since December 2023 with no trial progress, Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay found the serious nature of rape allegations sufficient grounds to deny bail reconsideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  4. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./4900/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Suleman Tuti's bail plea in a rape case, marking the third rejection after previous denials in 2024 and 2025. Despite arguments that the case was instituted at the victim's husband's instance and the petitioner has been in custody since December 2023 with no trial progress, Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay found the serious nature of rape allegations sufficient grounds to deny bail reconsideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case