MAHESWAR PINGUA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - AZEEMUDDIN, ,DEEPAK KUMAR — A.B.A./2835/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 69,89,125,BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010176572026

Filing Number

A.B.A./11362/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2835/2026

Registration Date

27-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 482 ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 69,89,125,BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHESWAR PINGUA

    Adv. KHUSHBU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - AZEEMUDDIN, ,DEEPAK KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Maheshwar Pingua in a case involving allegations of establishing a physical relationship on the pretext of marriage, administering medicine to terminate pregnancy, and refusing to marry. The court found that the informant, an already-married woman, had consented to the sexual relationship, and directed the petitioner to surrender within four weeks and be released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  4. 29-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

  5. 29-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2835/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Maheshwar Pingua in a case involving allegations of establishing a physical relationship on the pretext of marriage, administering medicine to terminate pregnancy, and refusing to marry. The court found that the informant, an already-married woman, had consented to the sexual relationship, and directed the petitioner to surrender within four weeks and be released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case