MANOJ KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - V.S.SAHAY — B.A./4904/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 3(2)(v),SC/ST(POA),ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010176462026

Filing Number

B.A./11351/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

B.A./4904/2026

Registration Date

30-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )

Sub-Category

Protection of children from sexual offences Act ( 14 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 3(2)(v),SC/ST(POA),ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ KUMAR

    Adv. SANJAY KUMAR PANDEY

  2. 2.AFRIDI ALAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - V.S.SAHAY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    Summary: B.A./4904/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to petitioners Manoj Kumar (hotel manager) and Afridi Alam (hotel staff) accused in a flesh trade case (Garhwa P.S. Case No. 239/2026). The court approved their release on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of equal amount, citing their clean criminal records and custody duration since April 7, 2026, despite state opposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  4. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./4904/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: B.A./4904/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to petitioners Manoj Kumar (hotel manager) and Afridi Alam (hotel staff) accused in a flesh trade case (Garhwa P.S. Case No. 239/2026). The court approved their release on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of equal amount, citing their clean criminal records and custody duration since April 7, 2026, despite state opposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case