UTAMJAY PRASAD vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - NAVEEN KR GAUNJHU — B.A./4861/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 137(2),87,127(4),64(2)(m),115(2),BNS,4,6,POCSO,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010176372026

Filing Number

B.A./11342/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

B.A./4861/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )

Sub-Category

Protection of children from sexual offences Act ( 14 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 137(2),87,127(4),64(2)(m),115(2),BNS,4,6,POCSO,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UTAMJAY PRASAD

    Adv. SANJAY KR PANDEY 2

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - NAVEEN KR GAUNJHU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    Case Summary: B.A. 4861/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Utamjay Prasad, accused under POCSO Act in a case involving alleged sexual misconduct with a minor. Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay found that the FIR and victim's testimony clearly indicated a consensual love affair between the petitioner and informant, with the informant willingly eloping on multiple occasions. The petitioner was released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  4. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./4861/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: B.A. 4861/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Utamjay Prasad, accused under POCSO Act in a case involving alleged sexual misconduct with a minor. Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay found that the FIR and victim's testimony clearly indicated a consensual love affair between the petitioner and informant, with the informant willingly eloping on multiple occasions. The petitioner was released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case