SURAJ ORAON vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA — A.B.A./2939/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 15(c),22,25,NDPS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 16th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010176332026
Filing Number
A.B.A./11338/2026
Filing Date
22-May-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./2939/2026
Registration Date
03-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
DRUGS & MEDICINES ( 125 )
Sub-Category
Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURAJ ORAON
Adv. AMAN KUMAR RAHUL,NAND KISHORE RAM,NAND KISHORE RAM, ,SONALI BHATTACHARJEE,NAND KISHORE RAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
Case Summary: A.B.A. No. 2939/2026 Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi rejected Suraj Oraon's anticipatory bail petition in an NDPS drug trafficking case. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence against the petitioner, including the pickup van driver's statement naming Oraon as having instructed him to transport 552.6 kg of poppy husk to Birsa Chowk, corroborated by investigation witnesses, warranting denial of bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
09-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./2939/2026
Case Summary: A.B.A. No. 2939/2026 Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi rejected Suraj Oraon's anticipatory bail petition in an NDPS drug trafficking case. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence against the petitioner, including the pickup van driver's statement naming Oraon as having instructed him to transport 552.6 kg of poppy husk to Birsa Chowk, corroborated by investigation witnesses, warranting denial of bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts