RANJEET KUMAR YADAV vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABHU DAYAL AGRAWAL — A.B.A./3089/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 317(2),3(5),BNS,21,MMDR,ACT,54,JMMC,RULE. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010176182026
Filing Number
A.B.A./11323/2026
Filing Date
22-May-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./3089/2026
Registration Date
11-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MINES AND MINERALS ( 151 )
Sub-Category
Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development)Act 1957 ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RANJEET KUMAR YADAV
Adv. SANTOSH KUMAR SONI,MANISH KUMAR CHOUDHARY,MANISH KUMAR CHOUDHARY, ,MANISH KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABHU DAYAL AGRAWAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Ranjeet Kumar Yadav, a tractor driver apprehending arrest for illegally transporting 100 cubic feet of sand under BNS sections 317(2), 3(5) and MMDR Act section 21. The court held that prior criminal antecedent alone cannot be the sole criterion for denying bail, and considering the petitioner's livelihood dependence on driving and that the tractor owner already received bail, granted bail on Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, requiring surrender within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
09-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./3089/2026
The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Ranjeet Kumar Yadav, a tractor driver apprehending arrest for illegally transporting 100 cubic feet of sand under BNS sections 317(2), 3(5) and MMDR Act section 21. The court held that prior criminal antecedent alone cannot be the sole criterion for denying bail, and considering the petitioner's livelihood dependence on driving and that the tractor owner already received bail, granted bail on Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, requiring surrender within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts