KISHAN CHOUHAN vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BANDANA SINHA — A.B.A./2885/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 306,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010175802026

Filing Number

A.B.A./11285/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2885/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 482 ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 306,IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KISHAN CHOUHAN

    Adv. AMRIT KUMAR SINGH,VANDANA KUMARI SINGH,VANDANA KUMARI SINGH, ,ARVIND KUMAR SINGH,VANDANA KUMARI SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BANDANA SINHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Kishan Chouhan's anticipatory bail plea in connection with his wife's death case (Khelari P.S. Case No. 23 of 2024). While the petitioner argued the death was suicide with no evidence of his involvement in abetting it, the court found that antemortem injuries were present on the deceased despite the post-mortem report indicating asphyxia from hanging, warranting further investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  4. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2885/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Kishan Chouhan's anticipatory bail plea in connection with his wife's death case (Khelari P.S. Case No. 23 of 2024). While the petitioner argued the death was suicide with no evidence of his involvement in abetting it, the court found that antemortem injuries were present on the deceased despite the post-mortem report indicating asphyxia from hanging, warranting further investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case