LILA DEVI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILESH KR SINHA — Cr.M.P./1730/2026

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 12,DV,ACT. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010175182026

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./11232/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

Cr.M.P./1730/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

FAMILY MATTERS ( 132 )

Sub-Category

Domestic Violence Act ( 27 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 12,DV,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LILA DEVI

    Adv. ANURAG KASHYAP,LINA SHAKTI,LINA SHAKTI, ,LINA SHAKTI

  2. 2.PUNAM DEVI

  3. 3.MADHU DEVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILESH KR SINHA

  2. 2.SHIVANGI RAJ

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand issued notice to opposite party No.2 and adjourned the petition. Petitioners (Lila Devi, Punam Devi, and Madhu Devi) were directed to file service requisites within two weeks via speed post and court process, failing which the petition would be dismissed. The rule is returnable within six weeks, with further listing contingent upon receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./1730/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand issued notice to opposite party No.2 and adjourned the petition. Petitioners (Lila Devi, Punam Devi, and Madhu Devi) were directed to file service requisites within two weeks via speed post and court process, failing which the petition would be dismissed. The rule is returnable within six weeks, with further listing contingent upon receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case