GOBINDA MAJHI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BANDANA SINHA — B.A./5008/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(2),238(a),61(2)(a),3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010174892026

Filing Number

B.A./11205/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

B.A./5008/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(2),238(a),61(2)(a),3(5),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOBINDA MAJHI

    Adv. ABHISHEK KUMAR DUBEY

  2. 2.BADURAM HANSDA ALIAS BABURAM HANSDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BANDANA SINHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Gobinda Majhi (18) and Baduram Hansda (23) in a murder case, finding them implicated solely on co-accused confessional statements despite not being named in the FIR, having no criminal history, and having a co-accused similarly admitted to bail. Each petitioner was released on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties of equal amount, subject to cooperation with trial and conditions not to contact or disturb witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./5008/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Gobinda Majhi (18) and Baduram Hansda (23) in a murder case, finding them implicated solely on co-accused confessional statements despite not being named in the FIR, having no criminal history, and having a co-accused similarly admitted to bail. Each petitioner was released on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties of equal amount, subject to cooperation with trial and conditions not to contact or disturb witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case