VIKASH KUMAR BHIYAN @ VIKASH KUMAR @ VIKASH KUMAR BHUIYAN vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAKESH RANJAN — B.A./4838/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 64,96,BNS,4,POCSO,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010174612026

Filing Number

B.A./11181/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

B.A./4838/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )

Sub-Category

Protection of children from sexual offences Act ( 14 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 64,96,BNS,4,POCSO,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIKASH KUMAR BHIYAN @ VIKASH KUMAR @ VIKASH KUMAR BHUIYAN

    Adv. ANUPAM ANAND, ,PRANAV KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAKESH RANJAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Vikash Kumar Bhiyan, accused in a POCSO case, after finding evidence of a consensual relationship rather than enticement. The court relied on case diary para 47 showing the victim stated she had eloped and married the petitioner, with a four-year relationship and expressed desire to stay with him. Bail was set at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  4. 02-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./4838/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Vikash Kumar Bhiyan, accused in a POCSO case, after finding evidence of a consensual relationship rather than enticement. The court relied on case diary para 47 showing the victim stated she had eloped and married the petitioner, with a four-year relationship and expressed desire to stay with him. Bail was set at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case