AJEET SINGH GHAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRIYA SHRESTHA — Cr.M.P./1854/2023
Case under An Application U/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 482. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010174212023
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./12769/2023
Filing Date
18-May-2023
Registration No
Cr.M.P./1854/2023
Registration Date
17-Jun-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
Restoration ( 18 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AJEET SINGH GHAR
Adv. SAMAVESH BHANJ DEO
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRIYA SHRESTHA
-
2.NAVNEET KAUR RIMPEE
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: In Cr.M.P. No.1854/2023, the High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the petition due to procedural defects. The court found that the notice to opposite party no.2 was not validly served and directed the petitioner to file requisites for fresh notice within four weeks by speed post and court process, failing which the petition shall be dismissed. The rule is made returnable within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
22-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
14-Feb-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
02-Aug-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
29-Sep-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
29-Sep-2023
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
28-Jul-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
21-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-May-2023
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.M.P./1854/2023
Case Summary: In Cr.M.P. No.1854/2023, the High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the petition due to procedural defects. The court found that the notice to opposite party no.2 was not validly served and directed the petitioner to file requisites for fresh notice within four weeks by speed post and court process, failing which the petition shall be dismissed. The rule is made returnable within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts