RAMCHANDRA KUMAR @ BITTU vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJESH KUMAR, ,RANDHIR KUMAR,PINKI KUMARI — B.A./4919/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(I),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010173592026

Filing Number

B.A./11082/2026

Filing Date

21-May-2026

Registration No

B.A./4919/2026

Registration Date

30-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(I),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMCHANDRA KUMAR @ BITTU

    Adv. Md. Azam,AFAQUE RASHIDI,AFAQUE RASHIDI, ,AKASH KUMAR GUPTA,AULIA BEGUM,AFAQUE RASHIDI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJESH KUMAR, ,RANDHIR KUMAR,PINKI KUMARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail application of Ramchandra Kumar @ Bittu, accused in a murder case involving the death of the informant's parents. The court found strong circumstantial evidence against the petitioner, including the recovery of the murder weapon (brick) with blood matching the deceased, blood-stained clothes, and the victim's mobile phone from his residence, coupled with his confession. Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay held that this evidence was sufficient to deny bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  4. 21-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./4919/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail application of Ramchandra Kumar @ Bittu, accused in a murder case involving the death of the informant's parents. The court found strong circumstantial evidence against the petitioner, including the recovery of the murder weapon (brick) with blood matching the deceased, blood-stained clothes, and the victim's mobile phone from his residence, coupled with his confession. Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay held that this evidence was sufficient to deny bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case