DILLU TURI @ DILU TURI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJESH KUMAR — B.A./4910/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 319(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(2),61(2),BNS,66(B),66(C),66(D),84(C),IT,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010173462026

Filing Number

B.A./11069/2026

Filing Date

21-May-2026

Registration No

B.A./4910/2026

Registration Date

30-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Information Technology Act, 2000 ( 208 )

Sub-Category

Cyber Crime ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 319(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(2),61(2),BNS,66(B),66(C),66(D),84(C),IT,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DILLU TURI @ DILU TURI

    Adv. ANKIT KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJESH KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Dillu Turi, accused in a cyber crime case (Deoghar PS Case No. 25/2026), on the grounds that no victim had lodged a complaint, he had no criminal antecedents, and had been in custody since February 14, 2026. The petitioner was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with one surety being a close relative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  4. 21-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./4910/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Dillu Turi, accused in a cyber crime case (Deoghar PS Case No. 25/2026), on the grounds that no victim had lodged a complaint, he had no criminal antecedents, and had been in custody since February 14, 2026. The petitioner was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with one surety being a close relative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case