HARISH MAHTO @ HARISH KR. MAHTO vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJNEESH VARDHAN — B.A./4864/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 317(2),3(5),BNS,25(1-B)a,26,35,ARMS,ACT,17,CLA,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010173412026
Filing Number
B.A./11064/2026
Filing Date
21-May-2026
Registration No
B.A./4864/2026
Registration Date
29-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )
Sub-Category
Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARISH MAHTO @ HARISH KR. MAHTO
Adv. ANUPAM ANAND, ,PRANAV KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJNEESH VARDHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to accused Harish Mahto in a terrorist organization case, directing his release on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount. The court considered that no arms or ammunition were recovered despite his prior criminal antecedent, and he had already undergone significant custody since March 18, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
21-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./4864/2026
The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to accused Harish Mahto in a terrorist organization case, directing his release on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount. The court considered that no arms or ammunition were recovered despite his prior criminal antecedent, and he had already undergone significant custody since March 18, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts