MAHESHWAR PINGUA vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILESH KR SINHA — Cr.M.P./1651/2026

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 69,89,125,BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010171472026

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./10876/2026

Filing Date

21-May-2026

Registration No

Cr.M.P./1651/2026

Registration Date

27-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Quashing Matter ( 206 )

Sub-Category

Quashing of Order ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 69,89,125,BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHESHWAR PINGUA

    Adv. SATYAM KUMAR,SHIVAM KUMAR,SHIVAM KUMAR, ,MAITREYI UPADHYAY,KHUSHBU,SHIVAM KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILESH KR SINHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand quashed an order dated 11.05.2026 issued by the Judicial Magistrate directing a proclamation under Section 84 BNSS in Mahila Sadar P.S. Case No.04/2026. The court found the impugned order devoid of any reasoning and lacking recorded satisfaction, making it legally invalid. The petition was allowed and the order was quashed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./1651/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand quashed an order dated 11.05.2026 issued by the Judicial Magistrate directing a proclamation under Section 84 BNSS in Mahila Sadar P.S. Case No.04/2026. The court found the impugned order devoid of any reasoning and lacking recorded satisfaction, making it legally invalid. The petition was allowed and the order was quashed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case