MANGAL LOHRA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPT. OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR — JHHC10171002026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010171002026

Filing Number

WPC/6261/2026

Filing Date

21-May-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANGAL LOHRA

    Adv. SHUBHAM MISHRA,GYANDEV RAJ,GYANDEV RAJ, ,SHASHANK KUMAR,HARSH CHANDRA,ASHUTOSH ANAND NO (

  2. 2.,KAZI ASIF IQUBAL,GYANDEV RAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPT. OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR

  2. 2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, RANCHI

  3. 3.THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND REFORMS (DCLR)

  4. 4.THE CIRCLE OFFICER (C.O.), ANGARA

  5. 5.POOJA MAHILA SAMITI

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: The High Court of Jharkhand found the writ petition (W.P. No. 6261 of 2026) defective and declined to register it. The Court granted the petitioner three weeks to cure the defects in compliance with the High Court's Standing Orders; failure to do so will result in the application being deemed as never filed and dismissed without further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Orders(with defect)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  4. 02-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

  5. 02-Jun-2026

    Orders(with defect)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  6. 29-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 21-May-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: The High Court of Jharkhand found the writ petition (W.P. No. 6261 of 2026) defective and declined to register it. The Court granted the petitioner three weeks to cure the defects in compliance with the High Court's Standing Orders; failure to do so will result in the application being deemed as never filed and dismissed without further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case