ASHIK ORAON @ GANGA ORAON vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - FAHAD ALLAM — B.A./5740/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 65(1),351(2),351(3),3(5),BNS,4,6,POCSO,ACT. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Next hearing 22-Jun-2026

CNR: JHHC010167962026

Filing Number

B.A./10582/2026

Filing Date

19-May-2026

Registration No

B.A./5740/2026

Registration Date

20-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )

Sub-Category

Protection of children from sexual offences Act ( 14 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 65(1),351(2),351(3),3(5),BNS,4,6,POCSO,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHIK ORAON @ GANGA ORAON

    Adv. KRIPA SHANKAR NANDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - FAHAD ALLAM

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jun-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  3. 22-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  4. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: B.A. 10582/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand allowed interlocutory application I.A. 7327/2026, ignoring defect no. 1 as pointed out by the office, with the State having no objection. The petitioner was permitted to correct paragraph 1 and the prayer portion of the bail application to align with sections mentioned in the FIR. The case was adjourned to 22nd June 2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 09-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 19-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./5740/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: B.A. 10582/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand allowed interlocutory application I.A. 7327/2026, ignoring defect no. 1 as pointed out by the office, with the State having no objection. The petitioner was permitted to correct paragraph 1 and the prayer portion of the bail application to align with sections mentioned in the FIR. The case was adjourned to 22nd June 2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case