TIPU ANSARI vs STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, PAKUR Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN — WPC/3951/2026
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010165282026
Filing Number
WPC/6102/2026
Filing Date
15-May-2026
Registration No
WPC/3951/2026
Registration Date
06-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MINES AND MINERALS ( 151 )
Sub-Category
Mines and Minerals Concession Rules 1960 ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TIPU ANSARI
Adv. NILLOHIT CHOUBEY,MS. SHRUTI SHEKHAR,MS. SHRUTI SHEKHAR, ,SUMEET GADODIA,SHILPI SANDIL,ANISH LAL,NIDHI LALL,PRAKHAR HARIT,SANYA KUMARI,MS. SHRUTI SHEKHAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, PAKUR Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN
-
2.DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, PAKUR
-
3.ASSISTANT MINING OFFICER, PAKUR
-
4.MINES INSPECTOR, PAKUR
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
Case Summary: WPC/3951/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand consolidated ten related petitions by Tipu Ansari against the State of Jharkhand and mining officers. On June 10, 2026, the court issued a Rule in all petitions, consolidated them under WPC No. 3907/2026, and waived service on respondents. The court corrected a procedural error in a prior order and admitted a new filing petition for regular processing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
15-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/3951/2026
Case Summary: WPC/3951/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand consolidated ten related petitions by Tipu Ansari against the State of Jharkhand and mining officers. On June 10, 2026, the court issued a Rule in all petitions, consolidated them under WPC No. 3907/2026, and waived service on respondents. The court corrected a procedural error in a prior order and admitted a new filing petition for regular processing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts