TIPU ANSARI vs STATE OF JHARKHAND,THROUGH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,PAKUR Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN — WPC/3950/2026
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010165242026
Filing Number
WPC/6099/2026
Filing Date
15-May-2026
Registration No
WPC/3950/2026
Registration Date
06-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MINES AND MINERALS ( 151 )
Sub-Category
Mines and Minerals Concession Rules 1960 ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TIPU ANSARI
Adv. NILLOHIT CHOUBEY,PRAKHAR HARIT,PRAKHAR HARIT, ,MS. SHRUTI SHEKHAR,SANYA KUMARI,NIDHI LALL,ANISH LAL,SUMEET GADODIA,SHILPI SANDIL,PRAKHAR HARIT
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND,THROUGH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,PAKUR Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN
-
2.DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, PAKUR
-
3.ASSISTANT MINING OFFICER, PAKUR
-
4.MINES INSPECTOR, PAKUR
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
Case Summary: WPC/3950/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand issued a Rule in WPC/3950/2026 (consolidated with 10 related petitions by Tipu Ansari against the State of Jharkhand). The court tagged all petitions together, waived service on the respondents, corrected a procedural error in the prior order dated 09.06.2026, and directed the correction to be reflected in the original order and website records. The case remains in preliminary stages pending substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
15-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/3950/2026
Case Summary: WPC/3950/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand issued a Rule in WPC/3950/2026 (consolidated with 10 related petitions by Tipu Ansari against the State of Jharkhand). The court tagged all petitions together, waived service on the respondents, corrected a procedural error in the prior order dated 09.06.2026, and directed the correction to be reflected in the original order and website records. The case remains in preliminary stages pending substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts