TIPU ANSARI vs STATE OF JHARKHAND,THROUGH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, PAKUR Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN — WPC/3974/2026
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010165132026
Filing Number
WPC/6089/2026
Filing Date
15-May-2026
Registration No
WPC/3974/2026
Registration Date
09-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MINES AND MINERALS ( 151 )
Sub-Category
Mines and Minerals Concession Rules 1960 ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TIPU ANSARI
Adv. SANYA KUMARI,MS. SHRUTI SHEKHAR,MS. SHRUTI SHEKHAR, ,NILLOHIT CHOUBEY,PRAKHAR HARIT,SHILPI SANDIL,SUMEET GADODIA,ANISH LAL,NIDHI LALL,MS. SHRUTI SHEKHAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND,THROUGH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, PAKUR Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN
-
2.DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, PAKUR
-
3.ASSISTANT MINING OFFICER, PAKUR
-
4.MINES INSPECTOR , PAKUR
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
In WPC 3974/2026, the High Court of Jharkhand consolidated multiple petitions by Tipu Ansari against the State of Jharkhand and mining officials. The Court issued a Rule in all petitions on June 10, 2026, tagged them with WPC 3907/2026, and ordered deletion of a paragraph from its previous order dated 09.06.2026 that crept in inadvertently. The matter remains pending for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
15-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/3974/2026
In WPC 3974/2026, the High Court of Jharkhand consolidated multiple petitions by Tipu Ansari against the State of Jharkhand and mining officials. The Court issued a Rule in all petitions on June 10, 2026, tagged them with WPC 3907/2026, and ordered deletion of a paragraph from its previous order dated 09.06.2026 that crept in inadvertently. The matter remains pending for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts