BINOD KUMAR MAHATO vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DHANBAD Advocate - ASHOK KR YADAV, ,INDRAJIT SINHA,SWEETY TOPNO — WPC/4136/2026

Disposed: Contested--Disposed of as Withdrawn on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010164872026

Filing Number

WPC/6063/2026

Filing Date

15-May-2026

Registration No

WPC/4136/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND ACQUISITION ( 145 )

Sub-Category

Compensation Matter ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed of as Withdrawn

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BINOD KUMAR MAHATO

    Adv. KAUSTAV ROY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DHANBAD Advocate - ASHOK KR YADAV, ,INDRAJIT SINHA,SWEETY TOPNO

  2. 2.THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, DHANBAD

  3. 3.THE DISTRICT LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, DHANBAD

  4. 4.THE CIRCLE OFFICER, BAGHMARA

  5. 5.THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN

  6. 6.THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA THROUGH ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR, DHANBAD/DURGAPUR

  7. 7.BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED (BCCL), THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court allowed petitioner Binod Kumar Mahato's request to withdraw his writ petition challenging land acquisition proceedings related to a national highway project. The court permitted withdrawal with liberty to pursue appropriate remedies under Section 3H(4) of the National Highways Act, 1956. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  4. 15-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/4136/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court allowed petitioner Binod Kumar Mahato's request to withdraw his writ petition challenging land acquisition proceedings related to a national highway project. The court permitted withdrawal with liberty to pursue appropriate remedies under Section 3H(4) of the National Highways Act, 1956. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case