TAUKEER NOOR MOHAMMED SHAIKH vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABHU DAYAL AGRAWAL — B.A./5451/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 140(2),140(3),61(2),BNS,25(1-B)A,26,35,ARMS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010161272026

Filing Number

B.A./10265/2026

Filing Date

13-May-2026

Registration No

B.A./5451/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )

Sub-Category

Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 140(2),140(3),61(2),BNS,25(1-B)A,26,35,ARMS,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TAUKEER NOOR MOHAMMED SHAIKH

    Adv. NISHA KUMARI, ,AARYAMANN RELAN,PRAKASH JHA,ANKIT APURVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABHU DAYAL AGRAWAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Taukeer Noor Mohammed Shaikh, accused of abduction and extortion involving a ₹50 lakh ransom demand, noting he was not named in the FIR, never put on test identification, and a co-accused with similar charges was already granted bail. The court imposed conditions including a ₹25,000 bail bond with two sureties, cooperation with trial, non-interference with witnesses, and maintaining contact details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./5451/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Taukeer Noor Mohammed Shaikh, accused of abduction and extortion involving a ₹50 lakh ransom demand, noting he was not named in the FIR, never put on test identification, and a co-accused with similar charges was already granted bail. The court imposed conditions including a ₹25,000 bail bond with two sureties, cooperation with trial, non-interference with witnesses, and maintaining contact details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case