ANIL SINGH vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - JAYANT FRANKLIN TOPPO — Cont.(Cvl)/727/2025

Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010159382025

Filing Number

Cont.(Cvl)/5310/2025

Filing Date

08-May-2025

Registration No

Cont.(Cvl)/727/2025

Registration Date

27-May-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 118 )

Sub-Category

Contempt of Courts Act 1971 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 15-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIL SINGH

    Adv. ASHIM KR SAHANI,VIKESH KUMAR,VIKESH KUMAR, ,VIKESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - JAYANT FRANKLIN TOPPO

  2. 2.SHRI PRABIN KUMAR SINGH, CIRCLE OFFICER, BALIAPUR,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

    Summary: The Jharkhand High Court dismissed a contempt case against Circle Officer Prabin Kumar Singh, finding that the officer had complied with the court's February 5, 2025 order by passing a decision on October 21, 2025 regarding the petitioner's application for rent receipts. Although the petitioner alleged the rejection was based on incorrect facts, the court found no grounds to proceed further with contempt proceedings, but granted the petitioner liberty to pursue other legal remedies against the officer's rejection order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

  4. 13-Jun-2025

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

  5. 08-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cont.(Cvl)/727/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Jharkhand High Court dismissed a contempt case against Circle Officer Prabin Kumar Singh, finding that the officer had complied with the court's February 5, 2025 order by passing a decision on October 21, 2025 regarding the petitioner's application for rent receipts. Although the petitioner alleged the rejection was based on incorrect facts, the court found no grounds to proceed further with contempt proceedings, but granted the petitioner liberty to pursue other legal remedies against the officer's rejection order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case