Tapan Pradhan And ORS vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - LILI SAHAY (A.P.P.) — Cr.A(SJ)/587/2009
Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010159002009
Filing Number
Cr.A(SJ)/12476/2009
Filing Date
03-Jul-2009
Registration No
Cr.A(SJ)/587/2009
Registration Date
03-Jul-2009
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
Section 374(2) & 389(1) 389(2) ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Tapan Pradhan And ORS
Adv. MILAN KUMAR DEY, ,ADITYA RAJ,ARUN KUMAR,Shubham Sinha ( A C ),VIKRAM SINHA,ABHISHEK KR.SINHA,SURAJ KUMAR,SURAJ KUMAR,VIKRAM SINHA,SURAJ KUMAR,ABHISHEK KR.SINHA,VIKRAM SINHA,ABHISHEK KR.SINHA,ABHISHEK KR.SINHA,SURAJ KUMAR,VIKRAM SINHA
-
2.Santosh Lohar
-
3.Konda Pradhan
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - LILI SAHAY (A.P.P.)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar SrivastavaView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the criminal appeal challenging the 2009 conviction of three appellants for rioting, criminal intimidation, and voluntarily causing hurt. The court upheld the trial court's findings, finding the injured witness's testimony credible that Tapan Pradhan struck him with a sword while other appellants assaulted him with lathi and iron rod. The court found no legal error in the conviction and approved the lenient sentencing under probation (Section 360 Cr.P.C.) given it was their first offense, with the probation bond period having already expired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
-
24-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar SrivastavaView PDF
-
24-Apr-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
-
15-Apr-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
30-Mar-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
26-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
-
26-Mar-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
05-Feb-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
22-Jan-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
15-Jan-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
18-Dec-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
11-Dec-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
27-Nov-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
20-Nov-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
13-Nov-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
06-Nov-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
30-Oct-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
16-Oct-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
09-Oct-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
25-Sep-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
18-Sep-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
04-Sep-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
28-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jul-2009
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.A(SJ)/587/2009
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the criminal appeal challenging the 2009 conviction of three appellants for rioting, criminal intimidation, and voluntarily causing hurt. The court upheld the trial court's findings, finding the injured witness's testimony credible that Tapan Pradhan struck him with a sword while other appellants assaulted him with lathi and iron rod. The court found no legal error in the conviction and approved the lenient sentencing under probation (Section 360 Cr.P.C.) given it was their first offense, with the probation bond period having already expired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts