JAGERNATH MAHTO @ JAGARNATH MAHTO vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABIR KUMAR CHATTERJEE alias PRABIR CHATTERJEE, ,RAVI PRAKASH,PRASHANT PALLAV — Cr.M.P./1698/2026

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 33,IF,ACT. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010155062026

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./9961/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

Cr.M.P./1698/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

FOREST ( 137 )

Sub-Category

Indian Forest Act ,1927 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 33,IF,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGERNATH MAHTO @ JAGARNATH MAHTO

    Adv. ANUP KR.AGARWAL, ,KAPIL ANSUL

  2. 2.DHANESHWAR KUMARV MAHTO @ DHANI MAHTO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABIR KUMAR CHATTERJEE alias PRABIR CHATTERJEE, ,RAVI PRAKASH,PRASHANT PALLAV

  2. 2.THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: In Cr.M.P. No. 1698/2026 before the High Court of Jharkhand, the court heard petitioners Jagernath Mahto and Dhaneshwar Kumar Mahto against the State of Jharkhand. The petitioners' counsel requested an adjournment, which the court granted as a final opportunity. The case has been adjourned and listed for hearing after eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./1698/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Cr.M.P. No. 1698/2026 before the High Court of Jharkhand, the court heard petitioners Jagernath Mahto and Dhaneshwar Kumar Mahto against the State of Jharkhand. The petitioners' counsel requested an adjournment, which the court granted as a final opportunity. The case has been adjourned and listed for hearing after eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case