UDAY KANT PATHAK vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ACB Advocate - VINEET KUMAR VASHISTHA — Cr.A(SJ)/445/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 13(2),13(I)(c),,13(I),(d),PC,ACT. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010153942026

Filing Number

Cr.A(SJ)/9902/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

Cr.A(SJ)/445/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CORRUPTION ( 120 )

Sub-Category

Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 13(2),13(I)(c),,13(I),(d),PC,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UDAY KANT PATHAK

    Adv. RISHAV KUMAR,INDRAJIT SINHA,INDRAJIT SINHA, ,KASHISH TIWARY,SHARADA KUMARI,SOUMA RANJAN MUKHERJEE,RASHIKA BAJAJ,KAUSHIK CHAKRABORTY,ARPAN MISHRA,INDRAJIT SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ACB Advocate - VINEET KUMAR VASHISTHA

  2. 2.SATISH CHANDRA JHA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: In Cr.A(SJ) No.445/2026, the High Court of Jharkhand (Justice Rajesh Kumar) adjourned the appeal filed by Uday Kant Pathak against the State of Jharkhand. The court directed the State counsel to disclose the victim's identity, inform the victim about the pending appeal, and file an affidavit confirming such notification. The case was listed for hearing after two weeks (19.06.2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

  4. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.A(SJ)/445/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Cr.A(SJ) No.445/2026, the High Court of Jharkhand (Justice Rajesh Kumar) adjourned the appeal filed by Uday Kant Pathak against the State of Jharkhand. The court directed the State counsel to disclose the victim's identity, inform the victim about the pending appeal, and file an affidavit confirming such notification. The case was listed for hearing after two weeks (19.06.2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case