AVISEK KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAVI PRAKASH — Cr.M.P./1030/2021

Case under An Application U/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 498A,406,323,120B,34,IPC,3,4,DP,ACT. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: JHHC010153722021

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./12446/2021

Filing Date

08-06-2021

Registration No

Cr.M.P./1030/2021

Registration Date

16-06-2021

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Quashing Matter ( 206 )

Sub-Category

Quashing of Entire Criminal Proceedings ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 498A,406,323,120B,34,IPC,3,4,DP,ACT

Petitioner(s)

AVISEK KUMAR

Adv. SURAJ SINGH,SUNIL SINGH,SUNIL SINGH, ,SUNIL SINGH

PUNAM JHA

HRIDAY NARAYAN JHA

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAVI PRAKASH

BHAWNA JHA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

19-07-2021

LAWAZIMA

05-03-2025

Admission

03-01-2024

Admission

20-12-2023

Admission

13-12-2023

Admission

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand ordered fresh notice to be issued to opposite party no.2 via speed post and court process, with petitioners required to file requisites within three weeks or face automatic dismissal. The court vacated the interim relief granted on 20.09.2021 as petitioners were unprepared for hearing, with notice returnable within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand ordered fresh notice to be issued to opposite party no.2 via speed post and court process, with petitioners required to file requisites within three weeks or face automatic dismissal. The court vacated the interim relief granted on 20.09.2021 as petitioners were unprepared for hearing, with notice returnable within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case