BRIJESH KUMAR BAJPAI vs JITENDRA KUMAR BAJPAI — C.M.P./570/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010152422026

Filing Number

C.M.P./5442/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

C.M.P./570/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

ARTICLE-227 ( 13 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BRIJESH KUMAR BAJPAI

    Adv. AJAY KUMAR SAH,KASHISH TIWARY,KASHISH TIWARY, ,AKHOURI AWINASH KUMAR,KUMAR VIMAL,INDRAJIT SINHA,KASHISH TIWARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JITENDRA KUMAR BAJPAI

  2. 2.MANJU BAJPAI

  3. 3.NITESH KUMAR BAJPAI

  4. 4.NISHANT BAJPAI

  5. 5.RAJESH KUMAR BAJPAI

  6. 6.SOURAV MISHRA

  7. 7.SMT. PRATIBHA MISHRA

  8. 8.PREETI MISHRA

  9. 9.ANKITA MISHRA

  10. 10.KRITIKA MISHRA

  11. 11.SMT. ASHA MISHRA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: C.M.P. 570/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand issued notice to the opposite parties. The petitioner was directed to file service requisites within one week via speed post and court process, with the petition dismissible for non-compliance. The rule is returnable within six weeks, with further listing contingent on receipt of service reports. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.M.P./570/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.M.P. 570/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand issued notice to the opposite parties. The petitioner was directed to file service requisites within one week via speed post and court process, with the petition dismissible for non-compliance. The rule is returnable within six weeks, with further listing contingent on receipt of service reports. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case