BANKA MAHATO vs TILAK MAHATO Advocate - AMIT KUMAR, ,AJAY KUMAR — C.M.P./567/2026
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010152292026
Filing Number
C.M.P./5432/2026
Filing Date
05-May-2026
Registration No
C.M.P./567/2026
Registration Date
10-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )
Sub-Category
ARTICLE-227 ( 13 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BANKA MAHATO
Adv. PRABHASH KUMAR,MANISH SHARMA,MANISH SHARMA, ,P PRADHAN,GANESH RAM,MANISH SHARMA
-
2.MANOJ MAHATO
Respondent(s)
-
1.TILAK MAHATO Advocate - AMIT KUMAR, ,AJAY KUMAR
-
2.MUNKU MAHATO ALIAS MUNKU HEMBRAM
-
3.SOBHA MAHATO
-
4.ABHA MAHATO
-
5.PRATIMA MAHATO
-
6.LATIKA MAHATO
-
7.KALAWATI DEVI
-
8.SUNITA DEVI
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
In CMP 567/2026 before the High Court of Jharkhand, notice was issued to opposite parties. Petitioners must file service requisites within 3 weeks via speed post and court process; failure results in automatic dismissal. The rule is returnable in 6 weeks, with further listing contingent on receipt of service reports. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
05-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. C.M.P./567/2026
In CMP 567/2026 before the High Court of Jharkhand, notice was issued to opposite parties. Petitioners must file service requisites within 3 weeks via speed post and court process; failure results in automatic dismissal. The rule is returnable in 6 weeks, with further listing contingent on receipt of service reports. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts