ARCHANA APARAJITA W/O LATE AMAR KUMAR vs MS ASCEND TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD THROUGH ITS C E O AND DIRECTOR Advocate - RAJ KUMAR GUPTA, ,MRINAL SINGH,SATISH BAKSHI — WPC/2256/2019
Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010151932019
Filing Number
WPC/4129/2019
Filing Date
10-May-2019
Registration No
WPC/2256/2019
Registration Date
10-May-2019
Judge
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LABOUR / INDUSTRY ( 144 )
Sub-Category
Quashing Matter ( 23 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARCHANA APARAJITA W/O LATE AMAR KUMAR
Adv. INDRAJIT SINHA, ,AKHOURI AWINASH KUMAR,AJAY KUMAR SAH,VIPUL PODDAR,ANKIT VISHAL
-
2.ANUSHKA SINGH D/O LATE AMAR KUMAR
-
3.ALAKSHYA SINGH (MINOR) NATURAL GARDIAN ARCHANA APARAJITA (MOTHER) D/O LATE AMAR KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.MS ASCEND TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD THROUGH ITS C E O AND DIRECTOR Advocate - RAJ KUMAR GUPTA, ,MRINAL SINGH,SATISH BAKSHI
-
2.CIRCLE HEAD M/S ASCEND TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD
-
3.REGIONAL HEAD M/S ASCEND TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: WPC/2256/2019 The Jharkhand High Court set aside the Labour Court's dismissal of an employee termination case, finding the lower court's judgment "perverse" due to non-consideration of evidence. The court held that the Labour Court selectively ignored materials from both the employee (Amar Kumar, deceased and substituted by his widow and daughters) and employer (Ascend Telecom) when concluding he was not an employee under the Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, 1953. The High Court remanded the case for fresh consideration of all framed issues on merits within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Feb-2026
Final Disposal
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
28-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak RoshanView PDF
-
28-Jan-2026
Final Disposal
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
01-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak RoshanView PDF
-
01-Dec-2025
Final Disposal
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
19-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak RoshanView PDF
-
28-Sep-2024
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
-
19-Sep-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF
-
19-Sep-2024
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
08-Feb-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
08-Feb-2024
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
01-Feb-2024
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
25-Jan-2024
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
26-Aug-2021
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
-
26-Aug-2021
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
-
02-Mar-2021
Hon'ble Dr. Justice S. N. PathakView PDF
-
22-Jun-2020
Hon'ble Dr. Justice S. N. PathakView PDF
-
19-Jun-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-May-2019
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2256/2019
Case Summary: WPC/2256/2019 The Jharkhand High Court set aside the Labour Court's dismissal of an employee termination case, finding the lower court's judgment "perverse" due to non-consideration of evidence. The court held that the Labour Court selectively ignored materials from both the employee (Amar Kumar, deceased and substituted by his widow and daughters) and employer (Ascend Telecom) when concluding he was not an employee under the Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, 1953. The High Court remanded the case for fresh consideration of all framed issues on merits within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts