MD NASIM vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VINEET KUMAR VASHISTHA — Cr.M.P./1729/2026
Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 147,CrPC. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010151522026
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./9750/2026
Filing Date
05-May-2026
Registration No
Cr.M.P./1729/2026
Registration Date
15-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Quashing Matter ( 206 )
Sub-Category
Quashing of Order ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD NASIM
Adv. PRAN PRANAY,ZAID AHMED,ZAID AHMED, ,KEHKASHAN AFSHEEN,JITESH KUMAR,ZAID AHMED
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VINEET KUMAR VASHISTHA
-
2.MD MAHFOOJ ALAM
-
3.MD JAFAR
-
4.SK NAJIR
-
5.MD RIYAJ
-
6.SK MOJAHIR
-
7.MD TABREJ
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
19-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No.1729 of 2026 The High Court of Jharkhand issued notice to opposite parties 2-7 and directed petitioner MD Nasim to file service requisites within two weeks via speed post and court process, with the petition subject to automatic dismissal if requisites aren't filed. The rule is returnable within six weeks, with the case to be listed after service report receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
10-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.M.P./1729/2026
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No.1729 of 2026 The High Court of Jharkhand issued notice to opposite parties 2-7 and directed petitioner MD Nasim to file service requisites within two weeks via speed post and court process, with the petition subject to automatic dismissal if requisites aren't filed. The rule is returnable within six weeks, with the case to be listed after service report receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts