DILIP KUMAR vs UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY TO THE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE Advocate - ANIL KUMAR (Addl.SGI), ,NIKI SINHA,NIKI SINHA — LPA/309/2025
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010150742025
Filing Number
LPA/4919/2025
Filing Date
01-May-2025
Registration No
LPA/309/2025
Registration Date
18-Jun-2025
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )
Sub-Category
Clause 10 Of Letters Patent ( 24 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DILIP KUMAR
Adv. SHAILESH PODDAR,TWINKLE RANI,TWINKLE RANI, ,TWINKLE RANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY TO THE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE Advocate - ANIL KUMAR (Addl.SGI), ,NIKI SINHA,NIKI SINHA
-
2.THE CHIEF OF AIR STAFF, AIR HEADQUARTERS (VAYU BHAVAN)
-
3.THE AIR-OFFICER- COMMANDING (AOC), AIR FORCE RECORD OFFICE
-
4.THE PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF AIR VETERANS
-
5.DEPUTY CONTROLLER OF DEFENCE ACCOUNTS, AIR FORCE (DY CDA, AF)
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
In LPA No. 309/2025, the High Court of Jharkhand heard Dilip Kumar's appeal against the Union of India and others. On 06.05.2026, the court declined to refer the matter to mediation after the appellant's counsel stated he had no instructions to consent to mediation proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Mediation for the Nation Drive 2.0
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
22-Apr-2026
Mediation for the Nation Drive 2.0
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
08-Apr-2026
Mediation for the Nation Drive 2.0
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
13-Jan-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Rai
-
06-Jan-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
23-Dec-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Rai
-
16-Dec-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Rai
-
09-Dec-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Rai
-
02-Dec-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Rai
-
25-Nov-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Rai
-
18-Nov-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Rai
-
11-Nov-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Rai
-
04-Nov-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Rai
-
14-Oct-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
-
07-Oct-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Rai
-
23-Sep-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Rai
-
16-Sep-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Rai
-
09-Sep-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Rai
-
02-Sep-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Rai
-
26-Aug-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Rai
-
19-Aug-2025
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble The Chief Justice (M.s. Ramachandra Rao) , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
30-Jun-2025
Hon'ble The Chief Justice (M.s. Ramachandra Rao),hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
-
30-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. LPA/309/2025
In LPA No. 309/2025, the High Court of Jharkhand heard Dilip Kumar's appeal against the Union of India and others. On 06.05.2026, the court declined to refer the matter to mediation after the appellant's counsel stated he had no instructions to consent to mediation proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts