KALESHWAR MAHTO vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MR.ASHUTOSH ANAND — Cont.(Cvl)/732/2025

Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010148812025

Filing Number

Cont.(Cvl)/4845/2025

Filing Date

30-Apr-2025

Registration No

Cont.(Cvl)/732/2025

Registration Date

30-May-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 118 )

Sub-Category

Contempt of Courts Act 1971 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 15-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KALESHWAR MAHTO

    Adv. ALTAF HUSSAIN,ALTAF HUSSAIN,ALTAF HUSSAIN, ,SHARABHIL AHMED,ALTAF HUSSAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MR.ASHUTOSH ANAND

  2. 2.SHRI SHASHI PRAKASH SINGH, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY

  3. 3.SHRI BADAL RAJ, DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, RANCHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

    Summary The Jharkhand High Court disposed of the contempt petition, finding that the Director of School Education had already complied with the court's 2024 order by issuing a July 2025 order fixing the petitioner's appointment date as 16.04.1982 for pensionary benefits. However, the court warned that if revised benefits are not extended within six weeks, the petitioner may file a fresh contempt application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

  4. 13-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

  5. 13-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 30-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cont.(Cvl)/732/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Jharkhand High Court disposed of the contempt petition, finding that the Director of School Education had already complied with the court's 2024 order by issuing a July 2025 order fixing the petitioner's appointment date as 16.04.1982 for pensionary benefits. However, the court warned that if revised benefits are not extended within six weeks, the petitioner may file a fresh contempt application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case