NIRMALA DEVI vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MRINAL KANTI ROY, ,MAHAVIR PD SINHA — Cont.(Cvl)/577/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010148682026

Filing Number

Cont.(Cvl)/5284/2026

Filing Date

01-May-2026

Registration No

Cont.(Cvl)/577/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 118 )

Sub-Category

Contempt of Courts Act 1971 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NIRMALA DEVI

    Adv. JASVINDAR MAZUMDAR,ANIKET JAISWAL,ANIKET JAISWAL, ,RAHUL RANJAN,ROHAN MAZUMDAR,ANIKET JAISWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MRINAL KANTI ROY, ,MAHAVIR PD SINHA

  2. 2.SRI PRAKASH KUMAR, SECRETARY, JHARKHAND MINERAL AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Case Summary: In Cont. Case (Civil) No. 577/2026, the High Court of Jharkhand (Justice Ananda Sen) heard Nirmala Devi's petition against the State of Jharkhand and the Jharkhand Mineral Area Development Authority (MADA). The court allowed MADA's counsel to accept notice and granted four weeks' time to MADA to file a compliance report regarding an earlier order dated 11.02.2026 passed in W.P.(S) No. 928 of 2026. The case was adjourned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  4. 01-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cont.(Cvl)/577/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Cont. Case (Civil) No. 577/2026, the High Court of Jharkhand (Justice Ananda Sen) heard Nirmala Devi's petition against the State of Jharkhand and the Jharkhand Mineral Area Development Authority (MADA). The court allowed MADA's counsel to accept notice and granted four weeks' time to MADA to file a compliance report regarding an earlier order dated 11.02.2026 passed in W.P.(S) No. 928 of 2026. The case was adjourned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case