TABIR ANSARI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - AMRITA KUMARI — B.A./4297/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 304B,498,34,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010148292026

Filing Number

B.A./9564/2026

Filing Date

01-May-2026

Registration No

B.A./4297/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 304B,498,34,IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TABIR ANSARI

    Adv. VISHNU PRABHAKAR PATHAK,KUMAR BAIBHAV,KUMAR BAIBHAV, ,KUMAR BAIBHAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - AMRITA KUMARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: B.A. 4297/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Tabir Ansari's bail application in a dowry death case (IPC §304B/498A/34). Though in custody since May 2024 with only two prosecution witnesses examined over 16 months, the court upheld its earlier bail rejection, finding insufficient grounds for release. However, the State was directed to promptly produce witnesses before the trial court without fail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  4. 13-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 01-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./4297/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: B.A. 4297/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Tabir Ansari's bail application in a dowry death case (IPC §304B/498A/34). Though in custody since May 2024 with only two prosecution witnesses examined over 16 months, the court upheld its earlier bail rejection, finding insufficient grounds for release. However, the State was directed to promptly produce witnesses before the trial court without fail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case