SUBHASH CHANDRA MANDAL vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJESH KUMAR — Cr.A(SJ)/420/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),351(2),351(3),352,BNS,3(I),(d),3(I),(gh),3(I),(z),SC/ST,ACT. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010148252025
Filing Number
Cr.A(SJ)/10015/2025
Filing Date
30-Apr-2025
Registration No
Cr.A(SJ)/420/2025
Registration Date
09-May-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL RIGHTS ( 114 )
Sub-Category
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Preven.of Atrocities)Act,1989 ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUBHASH CHANDRA MANDAL
Adv. ANJANI KUMAR,SUMIT GAUTAM,SUMIT GAUTAM, ,SUMIT GAUTAM
-
2.YASHODA MONDAL ALIAS YASHODA DEVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJESH KUMAR
-
2.Sujan Turi
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
Case Summary: In Criminal Appeal No. 420 of 2025, the High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the hearing after noting that despite valid service of notice, no representative of the informant appeared before the court on 4th May 2026. The case was postponed for one week to provide the informant with an opportunity to be heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
-
26-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF
-
26-Sep-2025
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
06-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF
-
06-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.A(SJ)/420/2025
Case Summary: In Criminal Appeal No. 420 of 2025, the High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the hearing after noting that despite valid service of notice, no representative of the informant appeared before the court on 4th May 2026. The case was postponed for one week to provide the informant with an opportunity to be heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts