PANKAJ PRASAD vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VIJOY KUMAR SINHA, ,SHIKHA SONAL,SAHADEO CHOUDHARY,MANOJ KUMAR — B.A./4278/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 69,BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010147002026

Filing Number

B.A./9468/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./4278/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 69,BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PANKAJ PRASAD

    Adv. LALAN KR SINGH,SANJAY KUMAR,SANJAY KUMAR, ,SANJAY KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VIJOY KUMAR SINHA, ,SHIKHA SONAL,SAHADEO CHOUDHARY,MANOJ KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Pankaj Prasad, who was charged under Section 69 of BNS 2023 for allegedly establishing a physical relationship with a major victim under false pretense of marriage and subsequently refusing to marry and assaulting her. The court approved his release on a Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties, considering that the chargesheet had been filed, with stringent conditions including mandatory court attendance and deposit of identification documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./4278/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Pankaj Prasad, who was charged under Section 69 of BNS 2023 for allegedly establishing a physical relationship with a major victim under false pretense of marriage and subsequently refusing to marry and assaulting her. The court approved his release on a Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties, considering that the chargesheet had been filed, with stringent conditions including mandatory court attendance and deposit of identification documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case