NIDHI RANI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VANDANA BHARTI — Cr.M.P./1691/2026

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 498A,323,IPC. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010146742026

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./9454/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

Cr.M.P./1691/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Quashing Matter ( 206 )

Sub-Category

Quashing of Order ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 498A,323,IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NIDHI RANI

    Adv. JITENDRA NATH UPADHYAY,HARSHIKHA KUMARI,HARSHIKHA KUMARI, ,AVISHEK CHANDRA,ABHISHEK KUMAR SINGH,MAYANK KUMAR,RAHUL KUMAR,HARSHIKHA KUMARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VANDANA BHARTI

  2. 2.BHARAT VERMA

  3. 3.RENU DEVI

  4. 4.KHUSHBU DEVI

  5. 5.UMAKANT SINGH

  6. 6.JYOTSNA GORAI

  7. 7.ASMIT SINGH

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No. 1691/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand issued notice to Opposite Parties 2-7 in Nidhi Rani's petition. The petitioner was directed to file service requisites within one week by speed post and court process, with failure resulting in automatic dismissal. The rule is returnable within six weeks, and the case will be listed after receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 14-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./1691/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No. 1691/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand issued notice to Opposite Parties 2-7 in Nidhi Rani's petition. The petitioner was directed to file service requisites within one week by speed post and court process, with failure resulting in automatic dismissal. The rule is returnable within six weeks, and the case will be listed after receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case