DINANATH SINGH vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KR MISHRA — Cr.Rev./489/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 138,NI,ACT. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010144972026

Filing Number

Cr.Rev./9359/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

Cr.Rev./489/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MERCHANTILE LAW ( 150 )

Sub-Category

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 138,NI,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DINANATH SINGH

    Adv. SURESH PRAJAPATI,SURYA NARAYAN SAHU,SURYA NARAYAN SAHU, ,GAURAV PRIYADARSHI,SURYA NARAYAN SAHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KR MISHRA

  2. 2.MUNNA JAISWAL

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

  3. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

  4. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    Case Summary: Cr.Rev. 489/2026 Dinanath Singh's Criminal Revision petition was heard before Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay. The court allowed his application condoning a 510-day delay in filing the revision (citing his age of 70 years and heart ailments). The court granted him bail during the revision's pendency at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, as he had already served significant time of his 6-month sentence. The main revision case was admitted, with notice issued to the opposite party for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 06-May-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  6. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.Rev./489/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr.Rev. 489/2026 Dinanath Singh's Criminal Revision petition was heard before Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay. The court allowed his application condoning a 510-day delay in filing the revision (citing his age of 70 years and heart ailments). The court granted him bail during the revision's pendency at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, as he had already served significant time of his 6-month sentence. The main revision case was admitted, with notice issued to the opposite party for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case