RAJESH KUMAR RAI ALIAS RAJESH RAI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRIYA SHRESTHA — B.A./3915/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 22(C),29,25,NDPS,27(b)(ii),DRUGS,COSMETIC,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010143952026
Filing Number
B.A./9285/2026
Filing Date
29-Apr-2026
Registration No
B.A./3915/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
DRUGS & MEDICINES ( 125 )
Sub-Category
Drugs and Cosmetics Act,1940 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJESH KUMAR RAI ALIAS RAJESH RAI
Adv. NITYANAND PRASAD CHOUDHARY, ,RAKESH KUMAR SHAHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRIYA SHRESTHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: B.A. 3915/2026 The Jharkhand High Court rejected Rajesh Kumar Rai's fifth bail petition in a narcotic drugs and fraud case involving alleged commercial trafficking of 4,295 bottles of codeine-containing cough syrup. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary found the allegations serious, with overwhelming prosecution evidence from ten witnesses, and determined substantial flight and evidence-tampering risks, particularly given Section 37 NDPS Act applicability for commercial quantities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
29-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3915/2026
Case Summary: B.A. 3915/2026 The Jharkhand High Court rejected Rajesh Kumar Rai's fifth bail petition in a narcotic drugs and fraud case involving alleged commercial trafficking of 4,295 bottles of codeine-containing cough syrup. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary found the allegations serious, with overwhelming prosecution evidence from ten witnesses, and determined substantial flight and evidence-tampering risks, particularly given Section 37 NDPS Act applicability for commercial quantities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts