JITU PAWAR @ JEETU MOGIYA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - AZEEMUDDIN — B.A./3908/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 310(2),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010143802026

Filing Number

B.A./9277/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./3908/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 310(2),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JITU PAWAR @ JEETU MOGIYA

    Adv. P.K.MUKHOPADHYAY,RAJ KUMAR VERMA,RAJ KUMAR VERMA, ,ASHISH KUMAR MANDAL,RAJ KUMAR VERMA

  2. 2.ROHIT KALAE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - AZEEMUDDIN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to petitioners Jitu Pawar and Rohit Kalae in a dacoity case (Katras P.S. Case No. 451 of 2025) under BNS Section 310(2). The court found that despite allegations the petitioners committed jewelry shop dacoity with co-accused, they were not named in the FIR and had been in custody since December 31, 2025. The court released them on bail of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties, conditioning release on trial cooperation, provision of mobile number and Aadhar card, and undertaking not to harass witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3908/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to petitioners Jitu Pawar and Rohit Kalae in a dacoity case (Katras P.S. Case No. 451 of 2025) under BNS Section 310(2). The court found that despite allegations the petitioners committed jewelry shop dacoity with co-accused, they were not named in the FIR and had been in custody since December 31, 2025. The court released them on bail of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties, conditioning release on trial cooperation, provision of mobile number and Aadhar card, and undertaking not to harass witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case